![]() From the first perspective, and among those who practice “mainstream policy analysis,” the pros and cons might be analyzed in order to determine the next move for one of the chess players. The mainstream policy scholar would approach the game from two perspectives. Let us start with how both traditions might study the game-of-chess as if it were a policy-related phenomenon. Mainstream public policy studies and interpretive policy studies While we maintain our lofty aspirations in offering a better understanding of both traditions and ideas for collaborations, our more humble ambition is to provide a shared language and a better understanding of more fruitful communications. Two people cannot summarize every aspect of both traditions, but we trust that our interpretations are not too narrow and not too far off. 1As two scholars in each of these two traditions, we wrote this commentary jointly in order to develop a common conceptual terminology and an understanding of research approaches. This commentary attempts to evenhandedly describe these two traditions for both new and experienced policy scholars. Moreover, collaboration offers the potential to conduct research together in order to advance knowledge and contribute to society. While we see differences in their orientations and methodologies, we also see goal similarities given their distinct foci and emphases. Instead, we compare and contrast both research traditions. Our purpose here is not to relive and reiterate these old debates-after all, let bygones be bygones. Yet, the opposite seems to have happened. Of course, conflict can fuel learning and, if properly handled, resulting in more robust and productive relations. ![]() The difference between these traditions has generated conflict in policy studies for decades, with some of the divisions passed down through generations. This idiom encapsulates ongoing miscommunications and animosities between mainstream and interpretivist policy scholars. A “tempest in a teapot” is a problem that has been blown out of proportion.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |